Congo:
New York Times Front Page Frontin'
July 6, 2006 - Within the past two weeks
the New York Times ran two front page stories on the Congo
and the Washington Post ran a feature story. Both papers ought
to be commended for addressing the worst humanitarian crisis
in the world and the deadliest conflict since World War Two.
However, once again (
click
here to see Friends of Congo critique of Time Magazine cover
story on the Congo), major media outlets fall short
in articulating the source of the conflict and the role that
foreign governments and multinational corporations play in
fueling the conflict and continued suffering of the Congolese
people.
Both papers continue to present a stereotypical, template
coverage of Africa that potrays Africans as depraved savages,
condemned to eternal violence, and perpetually afflicted by
corruption, poverty, hunger and incurable diseases. Very little,
if any in depth analysis or explanation of the root causes
of the crisis in the Congo is made. Such a skewed presentation
can only leave the reader feeling that the problem is intractable
and ultimately unsolvable.
The undeniable matrix of global profiteering from the Congo's
riches that fuels the conflict is either obfuscated or totally
omitted. The essence of the conflict in the Congo is the plundering
of the riches of the country. An unholy alliance among local
elites and/or politicians, rebel groups, primarily funded
and armed by Rwanda and Uganda, foreign corporations mainly
from Europe, South Africa, Canada and the United States and
the World Bank, through its International Finance Corporation
(IFC), all work to exploit the Congo and condemn the Congolese
to poverty and war (see Global Witness’ “Digging in Corruption”
http://globalwitness.org/reports/show.php/en.00095.html).
The Global Witness report estimated that $1.1 billion dollars
worth of copper and cobalt exports left just one of the eleven
provinces of the Congo in 2005. The report provides a peek
into the wealth that is being illegally extracted from the
Congo. The ten other provinces were not studied with their
vast endowment of bauxite/aluminum, cadmium, cassiterite,
coal, coltan, diamonds, gas, gold, iron ore, lead, manganese,
oil, silver, timber and uranium. Yet 80 percent of the population
lives on less than 30 cents per day and the per capita income
is $100 per year.
Quoted in the Inter Press Service, Annetta Weber of the Ecumenical
Network for Central Africa captured the essence and source
of the conflict in the Congo. She notes, "There's a worldwide
profit interest that the present plundering mechanism stays
in place. There are an enormous number of people siphoning
off Congo's resources. It's all laid out in reports you can
read on the Internet. There's the government elite, all kinds
of European firms, a huge number of African firms, and neighbouring
countries. It's a vast network profiting from the exploitation."
Professor Georges Nzongola-Ntalaja reinforced Ms. Weber's
assessment when he states in a recent interview with Pambazuka
News "The major powers of the world and the international
organizations under their control would like to legitimize
their current client regime in Kinshasa so they can continue
unfettered to extract all the resources they need from the
Congo."
In the final analysis, major U.S. publications can do a much
better job at informing their readers about what is at stake
in the Congo, the reason for the perpetuation of the conflict
and the role that Western governments and corporations play
in perpetuating the unconscionable poverty, atrocious acts
of rape and wanton killing in the heart of Africa.