|
A Call to Conscience
|
|
|
"We are not alone. Africa, Asia,
and free and
liberated people from every corner of the world will
always be found at the side of the
Congolese."
Patrice Emery Lumumba
==================================== Status of Bill
S. 2125 Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security,
and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006
The bill was sponsored by Senator Barack Obama
(Democrat from Illinois) and introduced on December
16, 2005. There are currently 12 co-sponsors of the
bill.
The aim of the bill is to promote relief, security,
and democracy in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo
Click
here to send a letter to your
Congressperson
now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
July 26, 2006 - Arguably, the most organized
and credible
institution in the Congo, the Catholic Church, has
raised serious concerns about the July 30th
elections. Catholic church leaders (Regional
Committee of Abbots) in Kinshasa, DRC called for a
boycott of the July 30th elections if irregularities
in the organizing of the elections are not resolved.
The outright call for a boycott is a stronger stance
than that issued by the larger Catholic Church body,
the National
Episcopal Conference of the Congo
(CENCO in French) on Friday, July 20th. CENCO
noted
that all the conditions were not in place for a
free, transparent and democratic election.
Therefore, if the irregularities are not resolved
before the elections, CENCO will call on the people
to abstain from voting and will not accept the
results.
CENCO vehemently attacked the idea of élections
coûte que coûte (elections at any cost). They
argue
that elections for the Congolese people are a matter
of “life and death.” Therefore they can hardly be
silent when they see that the elections are on a
path to be fixed or outright stolen. Some of CENCO’s
concerns are as follows:
1. Contradictory declarations about the exact
number
of voters.
2. The printing of supplementary ballots.
3. The absence of an official electoral calendar
beyond July 30th.
4. The suspicious location of servers in the
electronic counting system
5. The
presence of European troops in the country,
widely believed to be present to secure a Kabila
victory.
Although not totally unified (Church representatives in the
East –Bishop of Bukavu -of the country are encouraging their
parishioners to vote), one has to take the declaration of the
church seriously. Approximately 30 million of the 60 million
Congolese are Catholic. The Church has demonstrated its power
to shape the political landscape, its February 16, 1992 march
forced Mobutu to reconvene the
Sovereign National Conference and most recently the credibility
that it lent to the referendum results when it put in place
an observation mission in Kinshasa that validated the constitution
referendum results helped to allay any questions about the legitimacy
of the vote. Nonetheless, the Church is up against a formidable
foe in an international community that has made an investment
of over $4
billion dollars to stabilize the Congo.
Although, the electoral commission reflexively
declared on Friday the 21st that all is perfect and
everything is set for the elections, there are some
stubborn facts that are hard to get around going
back to the very start of the electoral process in
March:
• The extraordinary cost of $50,000 non-refundable
deposit to run for the presidency;
• The boycott of the elections by the major
opposition
party in the Congo for the past two decades;
• The murder of journalists Bapuwa Mwamba and
Franck
Ngyke Kangundu who wrote articles critical of the
government and the imprisonment of Patrice Booto,
managing editor of the "Le Journal" for “offending
the head of state” and “insulting the
government”;
• The expulsion of journalist Ghislaine Dupont of
Radio France International;
• The call by 19 of the 33 candidates to delay the
elections until the irregularities are addressed;
• Intimidation and beating of candidates;
• The lack of sufficient support both by the CEI and
CIAT
for a consensus among political players before
the July 30th elections, which would have increased
the chances of whoever is elected being legitimate;
• The scathing Carter
Center report about the
irregularities in the electoral process.
Whether the elections are fixed or not, one thing is
clear, palpable and widely believed among Congolese
both inside and outside of the country; should
Kabila win, especially in the first round, the
country will almost certainly become ungovernable
and possibly slide back into conflict. Among the
Congolese, there is almost no doubt that the
international community wants Kabila to continue to
rule the Congo; from alleged statements by Louis
Michel, European Commissioner for Development and
Humanitarian Aid, stating that Kabila has the right
vision for the Congo to the mining company moguls
praising Kabila for bringing “stability” to the
Congo and creating an environment for
investment.
At this stage, no attempts to delay or stall the
vote on July 30th will be tolerated by the
international community. With an annual budget of
over $1 billion dollars and at least $400 million
invested in the electoral process, it has too much
at stake to allow any delays even if it were in the
best interest of the Congolese people.
Many Congolese are clear about what is at hand (see
Dr. Nzongola-Ntalaja’s Interview), the
international
community has not spent over $4 billion so the
Congolese can elect a leader of their choice. One
would have to be ignorant of history or devoid of
any understanding whatsoever as to how great
powers
operate in order to entertain such fanciful
thoughts. great powers (U.S. Belgium, France, and
Great Britain for example) operate in their
interests, which
they call realpoliti
k.
The status quo in the Congo
whereby major foreign companies (George Forrest
International, Kinross
Gold Corporation, First
Quantum Minerals, Katanga
Mining,
BHP
Billiton,
Phelps
Dodge, AngloG
old
Ashanti and others) have unfettered
access to the Congo’s resources (copper, cobalt,
coltan, gold, diamonds, casseterite, timber, etc) for
generations to come is in the interest of the Great
powers. The challenge for the Congolese is to
organize themselves so that they will not be victims
of Great powers or for that matter, lesser powers
such as Uganda and Rwanda, nations that have the
blood of millions of Congolese on their hands. For
the West, the Congo is a geo-strategic game but for
the
Congolese it is a matter of “life and death” as the
Catholic Church astutely stated.
The key question that remains is, will the
international community be successful in imposing
its will
on the Congolese people and legitimize a client
regime or will the Congolese political class and the
masses of Congolese be able to play deftly the
terrible hand they have been dealt and somehow
determine and shape their destiny, in spite of the
colossal forces aligned against them?
========================================
====
Remember to visit Friends
of the Congo Blog and News
section for the latest updates on the Congo.
Friends of the Congo
Voice:
202-584-6512
The Friends of the Congo (FOTC) is a collaborative
effort of people of African ancestry and others of
goodwill who believe that the vast potential of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo can be realized
with strong support from the International
community.
Become a Friend of the Congo and change the future
of Africa and the African world.
|